Skip to content

Run metadata

AI simulationv0.3Fernbrook Software2026-08

FieldValue
Run date (real)2026-08-31
Standard under testkeystone branch readability at commit 2c88669 (v0.3 unreleased, after the phase-1 consistency/readability pass, before any simulation-driven change)
Scenario../../scenario.md (CertHub — wholly fictional)
Organisation../../../../organisations/fernbrook.md (Fernbrook Software)
Seats played byAI role-play throughout (Claude agents, one per seat, orchestrated per PROTOCOL.md); no human seats this run
Stages runS0, S1–2a, S2b, S3a, S3b, S4, S5a/b/c (parallel), S5d, S6, S7 (firewalled), S8 — 12 runs
FirewallHeld: S7 and S8 read artifacts/ only; findings files were never shared between seats
Outputs16 in-world artifacts, 12 findings files, findings/CONSOLIDATED.md, findings/NORMATIVE-CANDIDATES.md, REPORT.html

Outcome

~110 findings → 10 converged themes. Dispositions: 27 reference-tier fixes applied (commits 8bbe8ee…d5c977b); normative package approved by the maintainer and applied to the unreleased v0.3 as FSD-GV-8 (owner transition / continuity re-verification), FSD-GV-9 (service levels & reporting), FSD-SD-7 (conditions tracked to closure), FSD-SA-6 (key/secret management), plus note-level items (commit 3862314); role questions deferred to the Tier 3 guidepost; document-content guidance deferred to the v0.4 worked example (BACKLOG).

Notes for the next run

  • The historical artifacts/ here predate the v0.3 form changes this run caused — a re-run against the current standard should produce records with condition fields, register rows and operating-effort lines already in the templates. That delta is itself worth checking.
  • All-AI seats share blind spots; put a human in S5b or S7 next time as a control.
  • This artefact set is candidate seed material for the published worked example (Roadmap, v0.4): fictional, organisation-neutral, complete idea-to-succession.