Skip to content

Findings template

Each seat writes one findings file: {RUN}/findings/S<stage>-<seat>.md. Log both failures and successes — the review must be fair to the standard. One entry per finding, numbered sequentially, in exactly this format:

### [S<stage>-<SEAT>-<n>] <one-line title>
- **Kind:** gap | friction | ambiguity | worked-well
- **What I needed:** <the information, artefact, rule or role I was looking for>
- **What the standard gave me:** <what FitSD actually provided, with doc + section>
- **What I did about it:** <the local call made to proceed, if any>
- **Severity:** blocker | major | minor | praise
- **FitSD doc & section:** <e.g. FSD-PRO §7; reference/FitSD — Service Acceptance Criteria>
- **Suggested fix:** <optional — one line, e.g. "a thin shall", "a form field", "a Tier 3 role">

Severity guide:

  • blocker — I could not perform my function from the standard alone; I had to invent something material.
  • major — I proceeded, but a real team would plausibly get this wrong or skip it.
  • minor — friction, wording, or a small missing convenience.
  • praise — the standard actively helped here; say how, concretely.