FitSD — Information Stores
TL;DR — Every register and record FitSD relies on, in one place, described by what it holds and who owns it, never by which tool. So nothing is stored without an owner, and a team sees its whole information model at a glance. Non-normative: it adds no requirement. (Map below; also in FitSD — Diagrams §6.)
Why name the stores
Section titled “Why name the stores”A framework that requires records but never lists them invites the quiet failure mode where data accumulates (gate notes here, a risk list there, an access spreadsheet someone started) with no owner, no review, and no one sure which copy is current. Naming the stores is the cheapest way to keep that under control.
The idea mirrors ISO/IEC 27001’s documented information (clause 7.5) and FitSM’s record discipline, and it stays deliberately tool-agnostic: a “store” is a register or a record set, whether it lives in a wiki, a work-tracker, a spreadsheet or a database. FitSD says what must be kept and who keeps it; you choose where.
The map
Section titled “The map”The lifecycle row shows which store each stage creates or updates; the always-on group is maintained continuously by Govern and Secure & Assure across every stage.
The catalogue
Section titled “The catalogue”| Store | What it holds | Owning capability | Lifecycle stage | Borrowed from |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demand / pipeline register | Proposed, parked, rejected and in-flight work, with driver, status and reasons — below-the-line enhancement candidates may queue here too, with a named prioritiser | Solution Development → Govern (FSD-GV-4, FSD-SD-1) | Intake → delivery | FitSM PR1 (service portfolio); ITIL service portfolio |
| Gate records (Gate 1 / Gate 2) | Per-item decisions, conditions and approver; evaluation evidence (a PoC scorecard, an options study) files with the record it informed | Solution Development (FSD-SD-6; FRM-01/02) | Gates | ITIL service design records |
| Service Acceptance records | Definition-of-Done evidence per service, and any acceptance conditions tracked to closure (FSD-SD-7) | Solution Development (FSD-SD-4/5/7; FRM-03) | Acceptance | ITIL service validation & testing |
| SAC baseline (standing) | The organisation’s ratified Service Acceptance thresholds, inherited by every solution | Govern (FSD-GV-7) | All | ISO 27001 7.5 (documented information) |
| Service register / catalogue | Live services, named owner, status (incl. retired) | Govern (FSD-GV-2/4) | Live → retired | FitSM PR1; ITIL service catalogue |
| Document register / control | Governing documents with owner, approver, review cycle | Govern (FSD-GV-3) | All | ISO 27001 7.5 (documented information) |
| Risk register | Risks, treatment or formal acceptance, owner | Secure & Assure (FSD-SA-1) | All | ISO 27001 clause 6.1; FitSM PR6 |
| Supplier / dependency register | Suppliers and third-party dependencies live services rely on: owner, agreement, support horizon | Supplier & Supply Chain (FSD-SC-1) | All | ISO 27001 A.5.19; FitSM PR8 |
| Exceptions register | Time-bound, compensated departures from policy | Secure & Assure (FSD-SA-4) | All | ISO 27001 (risk acceptance) |
| Change records | Changes, risk/authorisation, post-implementation review | Change & Release (FSD-CH-3) | Live | FitSM PR12; ITIL change enablement |
| Incident records + per-service incident profiles | Incidents; what counts as an incident for each service | Run & Restore (FSD-RR-1/6) | Live | FitSM PR9; ITIL incident |
| Problem records | Root-cause investigations | Run & Restore (FSD-RR-3) | Live | FitSM PR10; ITIL problem |
| Backup & restore-test records | Backup scope/frequency/retention and dated test restores | Secure & Assure / Run & Restore (FSD-SA-3; SAC) | Acceptance + live | ISO 27001 A.8.13 |
| RAIDD log | Risks, assumptions, issues, dependencies, decisions per delivery — at acceptance, open risks transfer to the risk register and decisions (with rationale) into the service’s standing documentation | Solution Development (FRM-02) | Delivery | Project-management practice |
| Per-service operational documentation | The service’s standing document set — HLD (carrying the design decisions and rationale), runbook, recovery procedure, SOPs, user docs; for bespoke components, where the source lives and how a successor changes it | Service Owner (via Solution Development at acceptance) | Live → retired | The SAC Documentation criterion, given a home |
| Retirement records | End-of-life decision (renew / replace / retire) and decommission evidence | Run & Restore (FSD-RR-7) | End of life | ISO 27001 A.8.10 (information deletion); FitSM PR1 (status) |
The two FitSD adds
Section titled “The two FitSD adds”Most of the above are implied by existing requirements. Two were missing and are made explicit here:
- Demand / pipeline register — gives the upcoming and in-flight view that turns a pile of gate records into a portfolio. Without it, “what are we working on?” has no single answer.
- Retirement records — the close-out of the lifecycle (FSD-RR-7). Without it, services are never formally retired and the register’s history is incomplete.
See also
Section titled “See also”FitSD — Requirements: the requirements that mandate these stores (FSD-GV-4 especially)capabilities/govern/FSD-GV — Govern: Govern owns the information modelFitSD — Diagrams§6: the picturereference/FitSD — Service Acceptance Criteria: where the SAC baseline store is defined and ratifiedreference/FitSD — Standards Alignment: the FitSM / ITIL / ISO 27001 mappings these borrow fromreference/FitSD — Inputs, Activities & Outputs: which capability’s activities produce and consume each record